Welcome
- Details
- Published on Thursday, 01 November 2012 10:58
- Written by Super User
I know what you are thinking: "Here we go... Another site about Angelina Jolie....". But usually, the most sites you can find about her are about others as well...Here, no other. No one else than the wonderful Angelina Jolie.
I am regularly doing my best to give you the most about Angie. Detailed filmography with video clips and HQ captures, over 74.000 HQ pictures, 17.000 scans of magazines, loads of audio and videoclips, articles, the best links, and goodies such as wallpapers, icons, puzzles, screensavers, skins....
I, the webmaster, and my team, are 100% devoted to Angelina Jolie, as to you. Looking for anything about Angelina? You know what site you have to visit ;)
For a full-access to the Absolument Jolie webste and the news, please connect or register !
Last update : 29/07/2026 
Angelina Jolie's reaction to ex Brad Pitt falling off the wagon 'revealed'... 10 years after star's alleged drunken plane attack
- Details
- Published on Wednesday, 12 August 2026 04:05
- Written by Daily mail
Angelina Jolie was 'not surprised' that Brad Pitt has broken his sobriety, per an insider, after the actor stunned fans worldwide by revealing he was off the wagon after seven years. The actor, 62, first went sober after splitting from Jolie, 51, amid accusations that he poured booze on her and their children during a volatile flight on board a private jet in 2016. He denied the claims. The winery owner subsequently announced he had turned his back on drink and had been working through inner demons at Alcoholics Anonymous meetings – but revealed in an Esquire UK interview on Monday that he had 'gotten back off the wagon.'The former Hollywood power couple, whose acrimonious divorce took eight years to settle, have been besieged by drama ever since, with many of Pitt's children publicly siding with Jolie and choosing to drop his last name. A source close to Jolie claimed to Rob Shuter's Naughty But Nice column after Pitt's booze revelation: 'Angelina is not surprised. She tried to warn people. She knew this was always a possibility.' They claimed that Jolie had 'long believed that sobriety did not necessarily mean the underlying problems [Brad had] had disappeared.'She doesn’t believe Brad has fundamentally changed. She believes Brad is who Brad is, and no amount of sobriety or reinvention changes that,' the insider added. The Daily Mail has contacted representatives for Jolie and Pitt for comment and has yet to hear back. In the wide-ranging interview with Esquire, the actor admitted he had gotten 'back off the wagon' after the interviewer noticed the star had offered him a glass of wine. When asked if the beverage was for guests, Pitt responded: 'No, I got - I was sober for seven years. And then I got back off the wagon,' he said, offering a little laugh. 'In a more restrained manner. I got overconfident a couple times, went, "Yep, nope, not good for me." Not in big quantities.' Pitt clarified he was now able to 'have a few' glasses of wine but is unable to indulge any further. 'Yeah. Well... I can have a few. But I can’t have a lot. I have to be professional about it,' Pitt said. 'He likes mornings now anyway, and you can miss a lovely morning when you drink too much the night before, and it’s just not as interesting,' the profile noted of Pitt. 'Mornings are interesting, and he doesn’t want any more of them to go by unseen.' The revelation that Pitt has started drinking again comes amid his painful family drama. The actor, who is now dating jewelry executive Ines de Ramon, has been embroiled in a bitter legal battle with his ex, Angelina Jolie, for years, and the split has seemingly exposed his fractured relationship with their children.Last month, their daughter Vivienne, 18, followed in the footsteps of her three older siblings and filed a petition in Los Angeles County Superior Court to drop Pitt from her name.The reason behind the teenager's name change is listed as 'personal,' according to court documents obtained by the Daily Mail. An official court hearing is scheduled for November 2.Their daughter Zahara and son Maddox also published notices revealing their intentions to drop Pitt from their last names.
The advertisements were both published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal throughout June and July.Last year, Shiloh, who was born Shiloh Nouvel Jolie-Pitt, legally changed her name to Shiloh Jolie. Aside from Pax, Vivienne's twin brother Knox is the only other sibling who has yet to formally drop the actor's surname.Pitt has had a complicated relationship with alcohol that is alleged to have been the source of issues he has suffered with his family. His marriage with Jolie ended after a volatile plane incident in 2016 in which the actor was accused of being physically abusive towards both his wife and two of their children. In a 2022 court filing, Jolie alleged Pitt had been drinking during the flight and poured alcohol on herself and the children, according to CNN. 'At one point, he poured beer on Jolie; at another, he poured beer and red wine on the children.' Pitt denied the allegations and he was never charged in connection with the alleged incident following an FBI investigation. A source close to Pitt told CNN at the time the court filing was released: 'All parties have had this information for nearly six years and was used in previous legal proceedings. There is nothing new here and serves no purpose other than being a media stunt meant to inflict pain.' A year after his split from Jolie, self-proclaimed 'professional' drinker Pitt was sober.'I enjoy wine very, very much, but I just ran it to the ground,' he told GQ in 2017. 'I had to step away for a minute. And truthfully I could drink a Russian under the table with his own vodka. I was a professional. I was good.' For a year and a half, Pitt was in Alcoholics Anonymous, confiding in other men about the 'ugly sides' of himself. 'You had all these men sitting around being open and honest in a way I have never heard,' he told The New York Times. 'It was this safe space where there was little judgment, and therefore little judgment of yourself.''It was actually really freeing just to expose the ugly sides of yourself,' he said. 'There’s great value in that.'itt's relationship with alcohol went beyond personal and into business.
During their marriage, Pitt and Jolie bought the French winery Chateau Miraval, a property that is now at the center of their legal ordeal.Jolie sold her stake in it in part because of Pitt's 'acknowledged problem of alcohol abuse on their family.' Pitt addressed the 'family stuff' during his Esquire interview, admitting he battled suicidal thoughts amid his estrangement from his children with his ex-wife.The actor explained how the pain he felt was so 'oppressive' and, while he would never act on it, he struggled to see a way out.He told Esquire UK: 'I was never suicidal in any way. It just was not my makeup. In fact, if I have any afflictions, it’s probably being a congenital optimist. Which has helped many times, and it’s also gotten me - I’ve walked foolishly head-on into a Mack truck because of my optimism.'Or, as my forever-funny friend David Fincher will say, "Yeah, you see the glass as half full, but it’s half full of urine."'Anyway, I’ve never been suicidal except for one little period. And in that one little period, I just thought - I just couldn’t - just didn’t see a way out. The pain was so oppressive that - I wasn’t going to act on this, but I could feel - I could feel the cold steel of the bullet in my head, and it felt like relief.'And I thought, "Oh, okay, now I understand" - I understand suicide, in the sense that it’s just relief. It’s just looking for relief from the pain.'But I also think we have incredible survival instincts. And for me, that immediately kicked in, but it was just…Yeah. Like, listen: This s**t ain’t easy…And you’re talking to a guy who won the lottery.'When quizzed by the interviewer, Pitt confirmed he was talking about 'family stuff.'Now in his sixties, Pitt shows no signs of slowing down. His next film, Heart of the Beast, a man-and-his-dog story, will be coming out this fall, followed by David Fincher's The Adventures of Cliff Booth, in which he stars as a Hollywood stuntman.He just wrapped up the thriller The Riders a few weeks ago.But Pitt says he longs to be in his fifties again.He told Esquire: 'God, I want my fifties back…I would do more. Your fifties are just - man, anything that’s on your mind, go. Go attack it. Go attack it now.'
 |
source : Daily mail 
Angelina Jolie cuts a glum figure amid bitter Brad Pitt legal battle after ex asked court to order her to turn over financial records
- Details
- Published on Saturday, 08 August 2026 08:20
- Written by Daily mail
Angelina Jolie cut a glum figure in Beverly Hills this week amid an ongoing and bitter legal battle with ex-husband Brad Pitt over their French winery Chateau Miraval.The 51-year-old actress, whose older brother James Haven recently came out as gay, was seen stepping out for a lowkey errand run on Friday. Jolie and Pitt have been embroiled in a court battle over the French winery, with a trial set to take place next year in February 2027.The star kept it casual during her latest outing wearing a pair of black trousers as well as a black sweater. She additionally slipped into a pair of black flats and carried a black leather purse over the crook of her arm. The actress's long locks flowed down in light waves past her shoulders and she also opted for a pair of stylish shades. Jolie was spotted climbing out of a sleek vehicle inside what appeared to be a parking garage before heading to her next destination. Daily Mail has reached out to representatives for Jolie for comment, but has yet to hear back. Jolie and Pitt's legal showdown took a dramatic turn this week when the F1 actor asked the court to order the Maleficent star to turn over financial records. He asked the court to order the actress to produce records showing her income from 2017 to 2019, after she claimed to have 'largely put her career on hold' and forewent 'years of compensation' following their 2016 separation. Jolie allegedly agreed to produce financial records from the years 2017 to 2021, but has apparently only produced documents for the years 2020 and 2021.In court documents obtained by The Daily Mail, Pitt's lawyers allege Jolie has been withholding specific financial documents despite agreeing to produce said records. Jolie's Cross-Complaint alleges that, after the parties' 2016 separation, she put her career on hold, "forgoing years of compensation"; that Pitt possessed "substantial leverage and control" over her due in part to her financial condition at that time.'And that by 2019 she concluded she needed to sell her interest in Miraval to obtain "financial independence" from him,' Pitt's filing reads. 'On February 23, 2026, Jolie withdrew both her agreement to provide declarations responsive to Request Nos. 81 and 82 for the full 2017-2021 period and her agreement to produce participation statements from that same period.'They allege she instead provided 'supplemental responses limiting her production to 2020 and 2021, and later produced profit participation statements and tax returns for those two years only as well.'They are now seeking to produce documents showing her annual income and profit participation statements from 2017 to 2019.'Prior to the IDC [Informal Discovery Conference], Plaintiffs proposed that Jolie stipulate that she was not under economic pressure before January 1, 2020, and that Pitt did not exert economic coercion on her from 2017 to 2019. Jolie declined.'At the IDC, the Court then separately proposed limiting the scope of Jolie’s testimony concerning her earnings and compensation. 'Again, Jolie declined the proposal. Instead, Jolie confirmed at the IDC that she may argue at trial that Pitt used Miraval as leverage to control her and that her decision to put her career on hold bears on why the proposed NDA was allegedly abusive. The parties therefore did not resolve the dispute.'The Requests seek information directly bearing on financial assertions Jolie pleaded: that she forwent "years of compensation," that Miraval was her "most important asset." 'And that Pitt's control over Miraval distributions gave him "substantial leverage and control" over her during the period leading to her 2019 decision to sell her stake in Chateau Miraval.' One of the requests 'seeks documents sufficient to show Jolie's earned income during the period between her separation from Pitt through 2019 - the year Jolie allegedly decided she needed to sell Miraval.'
And the other request 'seeks documents sufficient to show Jolie's earnings from the profit-sharing bonuses she received during that period from her earlier acting and directing roles.'Yet, in a previous legal filing, Jolie hit back at Pitt's characterization of her remarks for 'financial independence', claiming she was misquoted.She also noted she has already provided financial records despite having 'no obligation to do so.''Pitt claims that Jolie has put her entire financial condition at issue going back to 2017 because of her allegation that she was seeking "financial independence." (IDC Statement at 3:2-6.),' a documented filed in June stated.'But Pitt's selective quote misleadingly fails to include the entirety of her allegation. Jolie does not allege that she was seeking financial independence in the abstract; she alleges that she was seeking “financial independence from her ex-husband [Pitt]."'The document also stated that the actress 'never alleged that she was in financial distress - her allegations are clear that she sought to untangle her financial life from the ex-spouse she was divorcing. That distinction is dispositive.'It further notes: 'Pitt also inaccurately ties his demand for a coercive NDA to Jolie's financial condition, but here too his summaries are not accurate.' It was later added that, 'The issue is not whether Jolie needed the money - the issue is that she was trying to untangle her life and her finances from her controlling and abusive ex husband. That distinction makes all the difference.' They also allege digging into Jolie's finances from 2017-2019 pose a 'serious invasion' of her 'privacy rights.' The F1 actor first sued Jolie in February 2022, alleging she had secretly sold her half of their French winery, where the former couple married in 2014, without his consent.The star claimed that he and Jolie had an implied agreement that neither would sell their share to a third party without the other's approval, a deal Jolie's side has denied ever existed.Two years after their marriage, it came to an explosive end after the pair got into an alleged physical altercation while on a private flight with their six children and Jolie later filed for divorce.The pair welcomed three children together during their romance: Shiloh in 2006 and twins Vivienne and Knox in 2008.They also adopted two more, Zahara and Pax, and Pitt legally adopted the son that Angelina had adopted before they got together, Maddox.Since they split, the two stars have been embroiled in one of the most publicized legal battles in Hollywood history over custody of their children, as well as the winery that they once owned together.In May 2021, after years of duking it out in court, Pitt and Jolie were officially granted joint custody of their six children, but one month later, the judge's decision was thrown out.And in late 2024, it was revealed that the former couple had reached a divorce settlement following a lengthy, eight-year battle. The fallout from their split has gotten progressively uglier.Zahara, Vivienne, Maddox, Shiloh and Knox have all stopped using their father's last name. It's unclear where Pax stands.Pitt has since moved on romantically and has been dating jewelry designer Ines de Ramon for the last few years.
 |
source : Daily mail
Angelina Jolie's brother James Haven comes out as gay at age 53... after split from wife Romi Imbelli: 'I am now free'
- Details
- Published on Friday, 07 August 2026 04:20
- Written by Daily mail
Angelina Jolie's older brother James Haven came out as gay on Thursday as he emotionally opened up about entering a 'new chapter' in his life. The 53-year-old actor, who is the son of Jon Voight and Marcheline Bertrand, took part in a candid discussion on his ex-wife and close friend Romi Imbelli's Substack livestream. Haven and Imbelli married in August 2024 during a ceremony in Laguna Beach, California. It was later revealed that she filed to annul the marriage just 15 days later. In the clip, Imbelli explained that she wanted to give Haven the 'opportunity to speak on this' after he also released a statement which was shared to her Substack.'Today's a new day,' she explained. 'We get to be this and you get to be, Gem, what are you?' He let out a laugh to ask, 'Is this the cue?' before he told viewers, 'I'm gay.'Haven also read the statement and explained, 'When I was a little boy, I was absolutely obsessed with the Disney princesses. 'I would sneak glitter onto my cheeks, swipe mascara onto my lashes, and for those moments, I felt like magic.' Jolie's brother added that he 'didn't have the language back then to explain why I just knew it made me feel more like me.' He further expressed, 'It was never about pretending to be someone else. It was about letting a part of myself shine that had always been there.' As years passed, Haven had started to question 'if that sparkle was something I had to hide to be accepted by the "normal" boys around me. 'Like so many gay kids, I learned to question parts of myself long before I learned to celebrate them.' Haven also shared that he was ready to tell the truth. 'Not because he's changed, but because he's tired of hiding. Coming out isn't about becoming someone new, it's about allowing everyone else to meet the person who has been here all along.' The actor added, 'I hope my family and others can choose love over fear, understanding over judgment, and connection over the beliefs that may have kept us apart. 'I hope they can look beyond the labels and simply see me with the same heart, the same laugh, the same soul they've always known.'
Haven explained that the 'little boy with glitter on his face and mascara on his lashes was never confused, broken, or something to be ashamed of. 'He was simply gay. He was joyful. He was brave before he even knew it.' Haven also talked about stepping into a 'new chapter' and feeling 'free' in his life through an additional Substack video. 'Today is August 6, 2026 and I, James Haven, begin a new chapter in my life. After many years of healing from childhood trauma, I am now free to live the life I believe I was always meant to live.'One of hope, one of peace, and one of love. So, as my story unfolds, I want you all to know that I do it with an open heart with nothing but love for myself and for all of you.' He sent gratitude to those who read his statement and for 'allowing me to be what I was meant to be.' Daily Mail has reached out to reps for Jolie for comment, but has yet to hear back. During the livestream, Imbelli told Haven that she had a feeling he had been gay when they married, but did not want to admit it to herself. 'I didn't want to see it. I didn't want to believe. I knew it and I wanted to support you and love you,' she said. 'And then I didn't want to believe it because then it would mean losing you in that capacity, which I couldn't.' Imbelli, who has known Haven for over 20 years, said that he was still her 'life partner' following the split. 'We will do life together. You are not my close friend. You are my love. And you happen to be gay,' she said.
Page Six also reported on Thursday that Haven will officially launch his own weekly podcast titled Save Haven with James Haven, although a release date has yet to be announced. Imbelli, who is preparing to release a memoir titled Breathe Mija, also shared a post to her Instagram account that included photos of both her and Haven. 'I wasn't here to out someone I love. I was here to help set someone free. There is a difference. In return he set me free,' she wrote.'Forgiveness, grace, and unconditional love have carried us to this moment. We ask only that you give him the same compassion as he learns to walk through this world with his head held high, exactly as God made him.'Love doesn't always fit into the boxes we're taught it should. Sometimes it transforms. Sometimes it changes shape. Sometimes it asks us to let go of what we imagined so we can embrace what is true.' She added, 'I'll always love him. Just not as his wife, but as my family, my best friend, and one of the greatest loves of my life...' Haven and Imbelli married in August 2024 after knowing each other for over 23 years at the time. The following year in March, Imbelli announced that she had filed for an annulment. Legal documents revealed that Romi filed for an annulment on August 27, 2024, just 15 days after the wedding took place. Haven and Jolie are both the children of Voight and Bertrand. The siblings infamously shared a controversial kiss at the 2000 Oscars and Golden Globes.
 |
source : Daily mail
Brad Pitt asks court to ORDER Angelina Jolie to turn over financial records after she claimed she put 'career on hold'
- Details
- Published on Wednesday, 05 August 2026 04:31
- Written by Daily mail
The legal showdown between Brad Pitt and his ex Angelina Jolie has taken another dramatic turn.Pitt, 62, is now asking the court to order Jolie to produce records showing her income from 2017 to 2019, after she claimed to have 'largely put her career on hold' and forewent 'years of compensation' following their 2016 separation.Jolie, 51, allegedly agreed to produce financial records from the years 2017 to 2021, but has apparently only produced documents for the years 2020 and 2021. The Daily Mail has contacted representatives for both Pitt and Jolie for comment. In court documents obtained by The Daily Mail, Pitt's lawyers allege Jolie has been withholding specific financial documents despite agreeing to produce said records.'Jolie’s Cross-Complaint alleges that, after the parties’ 2016 separation, she put her career on hold, “forgoing years of compensation”; that Pitt possessed “substantial leverage and control” over her due in part to her financial condition at that time; and that by 2019 she concluded she needed to sell her interest in Miraval to obtain “financial independence” from him,' Pitt's filing reads. 'On February 23, 2026, Jolie withdrew both her agreement to provide declarations responsive to Request Nos. 81 and 82 for the full 2017-2021 period and her agreement to produce participation statements from that same period.'They allege she instead provided 'supplemental responses limiting her production to 2020 and 2021, and later produced profit participation statements and tax returns for those two years only as well.'They are now seeking to produce documents showing her annual income and profit participation statements from 2017 to 2019. 'Prior to the IDC [Informal Discovery Conference], Plaintiffs proposed that Jolie stipulate that she was not under economic pressure before January 1, 2020, and that Pitt did not exert economic coercion on her from 2017 to 2019. Jolie declined.'At the IDC, the Court then separately proposed limiting the scope of Jolie’s testimony concerning her earnings and compensation. Again, Jolie declined the proposal. Instead, Jolie confirmed at the IDC that she may argue at trial that Pitt used Miraval as leverage to control her and that her decision to put her career on hold bears on why the proposed NDA was allegedly abusive. The parties therefore did not resolve the dispute.''The Requests seek information directly bearing on financial assertions Jolie pleaded: that she forwent “years of compensation,” that Miraval was her “most important asset,” and that Pitt’s control over Miraval distributions gave him “substantial leverage and control” over her during the period leading to her 2019 decision to sell her stake in Chateau Miraval.''Request No. 81 seeks documents sufficient to show Jolie’s earned income during the period between her separation from Pitt through 2019— the year Jolie allegedly decided she needed to sell Miraval—while Request No. 82 seeks documents sufficient to show Jolie’s earnings from the profit-sharing bonuses she received during that period from her earlier acting and directing roles.' 'Jolie may be able to establish from public information that she held fewer acting or directing roles from 2017–2019 than she did in prior years. But paragraph 23 of her Cross Complaint goes further: it alleges that she forwent “years of compensation.” Documents showing the earned income and profit participation payments she received during those years will permit Plaintiffs to test the accuracy and context of that allegation.' Yet, in a previous legal filing, Jolie hit back at Pitt's characterization of her remarks for 'financial independence', claiming she was misquoted.
She also noted she has already provided financial records despite having 'no obligation to do so.' 'Pitt claims that Jolie has put her entire financial condition at issue going back to 2017 because of her allegation that she was seeking “financial independence.” (IDC Statement at 3:2-6.),' a documented filed in June stated. 'But Pitt’s selective quote misleadingly fails to include the entirety of her allegation. Jolie does not allege that she was seeking financial independence in the abstract; she alleges that she was seeking “financial independence from her ex-husband [Pitt].”''Separating from one’s ex-husband is categorically different from an allegation that one is suffering general financial distress. Jolie has never alleged that she was in financial distress—her allegations are clear that she sought to untangle her financial life from the ex-spouse she was divorcing. That distinction is dispositive.'It further notes: 'Pitt also inaccurately ties his demand for a coercive NDA to Jolie’s financial condition, but here too his summaries are not accurate. Appearing to mock her, Pitt highlights that the NDA he proposed “nearly broke her,” and concludes from this, in conjunction with Jolie’s conclusion that she had to sell Miraval to someone else, that Jolie placed Her entire financial condition at issue because she felt “financially cornered.” But the phrase “financially cornered” is Pitt’s phrase, not Jolie’s. Jolie never once made that allegation. 'And the distinction above applies here too: her ex-husband was attempting to have her sign an NDA to cover up his abuse of her and their children as a condition to him buying her most valuable asset, which was their biggest financial entanglement. The issue is not whether Jolie needed the money—the issue is that she was trying to untangle her life and her finances from her controlling and abusive ex husband. That distinction makes all the difference.' They also allege digging into Jolie's finances from 2017-2019 pose a 'serious invasion' of her 'privacy rights.' 'In short, the entire basis for Pitt compelling these answers is a made-up theory that Jolie did not allege. Nevertheless, to narrow the dispute, and although she feels very strongly that she did not have to do this, Jolie already agreed to produce and has in fact produced her tax returns, and all of her profit participation statements showing any income received, for 2020 and 2021 Although Jolie had no obligation to do so, producing these documents should have ended this dispute. These two years of private financial information—leading up to (2020) and during (2021) – the very dispute that is at the center of this case—already provided Pitt all the insight he needs into Jolie’s financial condition. Going back any further is a serious invasion of Jolie’s privacy rights'.
For a decade, Pitt and Jolie were seen as Hollywood's 'It' couple during their long-term relationship after they met on the set of the 2005 film Mr and Mrs Smith.They married in August 2014 during a secret ceremony in the South of France and welcomed three children together during their romance: Shiloh in 2006 and twins Vivienne and Knox in 2008.They also adopted two more, Zahara and Pax, and Pitt legally adopted the son that Angelina had adopted before they got together, Maddox. But in 2016, it came to an explosive end after the pair got into an alleged physical altercation while on a private flight with their six children and Jolie later filed for divorce. Jolie later claimed that Pitt 'choked' one of the children during the horrifying dispute and 'struck' another in the face, leaving her and the youngsters feeling like 'hostages' and cowering in fear under a blanket for hours until they landed.She also alleged that he grabbed her by the head, slammed her against a wall, and violently shook her at one point during the flight - which resulted in her injuring her back and elbow. Pitt's representative called Jolie's account 'completely untrue' to CNN at first, but then released an amended statement to the publication that read, 'Angelina's story continues to evolve each time she tells it.'Brad has accepted responsibility for what he did but will not for things he didn’t do. He has been on the receiving end of every type of personal attack and misrepresentation.'Thankfully, the various public authorities she has tried to use against him over the past six years have made their own independent decisions. Brad will continue to respond in court as he has consistently done.'Since they split, the two stars have been embroiled in one of the most publicized legal battles in Hollywood history over custody of their children, as well as the winery that they once owned together.In May 2021, after years of duking it out in court, Pitt and Jolie were officially granted joint custody of their six children, but one month later, the judge's decision was thrown out.The fallout from their split has gotten progressively uglier. Zahara, Vivienne, Maddox, Shiloh and Vivienne have all stopped using their father's last name. It's unclear where Pax stands. Pitt has since moved on romantically and has been dating jewelry designer Ines de Ramon for the last few years.
|
source : Daily mail
Share
